LOEWENSTEIN & CO. CHIEF ACCOMPLISHMENTS

LOEWENSTEIN & CO. CHIEF ACCOMPLISHMENTS

WHAT DO YOU WANT FROM THE UCO ELECTION IN MARCH?

FOLLOWING ARE THE KEY “ACCOMPLISHMENTS” OF THE CURRENT LOEWENSTEIN ADMINISTRATION:

1) VICE PRESIDENT MYRON SOLOMON DRAGGED THE VILLAGE INTO A MAJOR LEGAL QUAGMIRE BY LAUNCHING A LAW SUIT IN VIOLATION OF THE MILLENIUM AGREEMENT PRIOR TO REQUIRED NEGOTIATION AND ARBITRATION; THIS POORLY CONCEIVED ACTION WAS VIGOROUSLY SUPPORTED BY PRESIDENT LOEWENSTEIN AND THE UCO OFFICERS TEAM; SHOULD THEY BE RE-ELECTED?

2) VICE PRESIDENT HOWIE SILVER, BASED ON WORK ACCOMPLISHED BY THE PREVIOUS MARSHALL ADMINISTRATION, PUT A DEGRADED VERSION OF CHANNEL 63 ON THE AIR WHICH EXHIBITS 1940’s LEVEL TECHNOLOGY IN LIEU OF A MARSHALL PLANNED PROFESSIONAL TV FORMAT; SHOULD HOWIE BE RE-ELECTED?

3) CURRENTLY WE ARE IN ARBITRATION, OUR CASE IS DUBIOUS AT BEST! WE ARE PAYING OUR LEGAL FEES WITH MONEY TAKEN FROM OTHER, BUDGETED, CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE LINE ITEMS, THIS IS THE “PLAN” OF THE CURRENT ADMINISTRATION, AN INTERESTING PROBLEM COMES OUT OF DEPLETING ESTABLISHED BUDGET LINES FOR THESE LEGAL COSTS; SHOULD WE IN FACT RECEIVE ANY AWARD FROM THE ARBITRATION PROCESS, IT WOULD BE PAID TO THE RESIDENTS, NOT TO UCO, HENCE RESTORING THE BUDGET INTEGRITY WOULD BE GREATLY DELAYED; SHOULD THEY BE RE-ELECTED?

4) THE LOEWENSTEIN TEAM HAS FAILED TO BUDGET FOR LEGAL EXPENSES WHICH HAVE NO FORESEEABLE LIMIT; SHOULD THEY BE RE-ELECTED?

5) THE LOEWENSTEIN TEAM HAS FAILED TO DISCLOSE, OR TO PROPERLY BUDGET FOR, THE COSTS OF SHORELINE RESTORATION OF OUR LAKES AND CANALS, WHICH WILL COST, IF DONE PROPERLY, BETWEEN 3 MILLION AND 8 MILLION DOLLARS; SHOULD THEY BE RE-ELECTED?

6) THE LOEWENSTEIN TEAM HAS FAILED TO BUDGET FOR A POTENTIAL INSURANCE DEDUCTIBLE OF $2,400,000.00 A LIABILITY OF $305.00 PER UNIT; SHOULD THEY BE RE-ELECTED?

7) THE OPPORTUNITY, NEGOTIATED BY THE MARSHALL TEAM, TO INSTALL MAJOR UCO FUNCTIONS IN THE CLUBHOUSE, AND IN COORDINATION WITH WPRF, TO PROVIDE “ONE STOP SHOPPING” FOR SUCH PRODUCTS AS PASSES, TICKETS, ID’s TRANSPONDERS, ALL ON COMMON COMPUTER NETWORKS; HAS BEEN SQUANDERED BY LOEWENSTEIN INCITED PERSONAL ANIMOSITY WITH WPRF; SHOULD HE BE RE-ELECTED?

8) LEGAL CONFLICT WITH WPRF, PRECLUDING FUNCTIONAL INTEGRATION OF KEY UCO TASKS IN THE CLUBHOUSE, NOW HAS LED TO THE POORLY PLANNED “NEED” TO CONSTRUCT A NEW UCO OFFICE BUILDING AT GREAT COST, SHOULD THIS TAJ MAHAL OF PERSONAL AGGRANDIZEMENT OF THE CURRENT ADMINISTRATION BE ALLOWED TO PROCEED? SHOULD WE ALLOW THIS TO GO ON BY RE-ELECTING THE GANG THAT CAN’T SHOOT STRAIGHT?

9) WHAT GAVE THIS CREW THE DIVINE RIGHT TO TURN OVER OUR PROPRIETARY FINANCIAL DATA TO THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY? WHAT GAVE THIS CREW, WHO’S FUNCTION, IS STRICTLY ADVISORY IN NATURE, THE IMPERIAL AUTHORITY TO DISPERSE INSPECTORS ONTO OUR ROOFS TO PRODUCE CONCOCTED FAILURE REPORTS? IN THE END WHAT WILL THIS ARROGATION OF POWER COST THIS VILLAGE? THE FOLLOWING RECITATION OF BAD JUDGEMENT SHOULD PROVE INSTRUCTIVE!

10) Failure: to uphold the oath of office of President of UCO.

11) Failure: to offer a limited apology to avoid the lawsuit by WPRF.

12) Failure: to offer an apology to a contractor that President Loewenstein personally denigrated, thus resulting in a $ 50,000.00 bill.

13) Failure: By, allowing the Nominating Committee to reject candidate applicants without any criteria, for the first time in the 24 year history of UCO.

14) Failure: to follow UCO by-laws, by requiring prior notice to attend Committee Meetings.

15) Failure: to provide an open forum for the WPRF/Operations Committee meetings, as required by the By-laws, this Committee operates in the dark and spends millions of dollars of our money, with virtually no constraints!

16) Failure: to allow open, uncensored discussions on the CV website/forum, a UCO sponsored function.

17) Failure: to maintain a properly updated reserve for the repaving of the Village. The fund has not been reappraised for 6 years!

18) Failure: by creating and encouraging the unnecessary animosity between Residents and WPRF.

19) SO! WHAT ARE THEIR STRONG POINTS? CONSTANT COMPLAINTS: “IT’S ALWAYS SOMEONE ELSE’S FAULT”; POOR JUDGEMENT; LACK OF CRITICAL THINKING; POOR PRIOR PLANNING IN ALL THINGS, ARROGATION OF POWER, EXCEEDING THEIR AUTHORITY; IN SHORT, A SOLID ABILITY TO SCREW UP ANYTHING THEY TOUCH! REALLY!! SHOULD WE GIVE THIS "KING MIDAS IN REVERSE" THE OPPORTUNITY TO SINK US DEEPER INTO THE QUAGMIRE OF EXPENSE AND ABJECT FAILURE? LINCOLN IS REPUTED TO HAVE SAID; “IF YOU WANT TO TEST A MAN’S CHARACTER; GIVE HIM POWER” WELL, LOEWENSTEIN & CO. HAVE BEEN GIVEN POWER AND THEIR CHARACTER HAS BEEN FOUND WANTING!!! SINCE THEY WILL NOT DO THE MORALLY CORRECT THING AND RESIGN, I SAY;

“THROW THE BUMS OUT”

LoT