Thursday, July 10, 2008

SUNSHINE LAWS - REDUX

Hi All,

Previously I Posted some Sunshine Law Information which was quite convoluted and information dense.



Elaine Brown found an interesting case therein which may be very much "On Point" as regards applicability of the Florida Sunshine Laws to UCO:



SHOW UP AT THE DELEGATE ASSEMBLY FRIDAY JULY 11, 2008

AND HELP RESTORE DEMOCRACY TO CENTURY VILLAGE



BLOCK ANY ATTEMPT TO CLOSE OR RESTRICT UCO COMMITTEE MEETINGS.



Dave Israel



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





REF:



http://myfloridalegal.com/ago.nsf/Opinions/178D106186D9351B852562A700749FB4





Recently, this office was asked whether a not-for-profit corporation operating as the direct-support organization for The John and Mable Ringling Museum of Art, a public museum, was subject to s. 286.011, F.S.


The corporation was created pursuant to statute for the purpose of assisting the museum in carrying out its functions; its board members were the same individuals who served on the board of trustees of the public agency, its offices were located at the museum and the organization was authorized to use museum property.

Based upon these factors, this office in AGO 92-53 concluded that the board of directors of the direct support organization was subject to s. 286.011, F.S.[4]

Enterprise Florida, Inc. (Enterprise), was created as a nonprofit corporation by s. 2, Ch. 92-277, Laws of Florida.[5] The Legislature, finding the responsibility for the state's economic development fragmented among various state and local agencies and private entities, determined that there was a need for such efforts to be strengthened and coordinated in order to ensure the creation of high-quality jobs and a rising standard of living for all state residents.[6]

Pursuant to the act, Enterprise "shall be registered, incorporated, organized, and operated in compliance with chapter 617, Florida Statutes, but . . . shall have only the powers and obligations enumerated in sections 1-7" of Ch. 92-277, Laws of Florida.[7]

The membership of the Board of Directors of Enterprise is statutorily prescribed and consists of certain state officials or individuals who have been appointed by certain governmental public officials.[8]

The act prescribes the manner of appointment of the board members, their terms of office, and how vacancies are to be filled; it further requires members of the board, not otherwise required to do so, to file full and public disclosure of financial interests at the times and places and in the same manner required of elected constitutional officers under s. 8, Art. II, State Const.[9]

An examination of Ch. 92-277, Laws of Florida, clearly indicates that Enterprise, although acting as a nonprofit corporation, is subject to the dominion and control of the Legislature.

Accordingly, meetings of the board of directors in carrying out its functions must comply with the requirements of s. 286.011, F.S. Therefore, I am of the opinion that the Board of Directors of Enterprise Florida, Inc., which is created pursuant to statute, and composed of public officials or individuals appointed by public officials, and whose powers and duties are statutorily prescribed, is subject to the Government in the Sunshine Law. Thus, meetings of the board, or any committee thereof, regarding the selection of a recruitment company must comply with s. 286.011, F.S.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

What has this to do with UCO?
This is a far fetched legal decision that does not seem to apply. On the other hand some people would like it to apply. Are some people concerned that this sunshine resolution will go down to defeat?

UCO President said...

Hi A Nony Mouse,
Those who support the Cult of the Elite of course wish this resolution to be defeated.

Those who enjoy Democracy and Government in the Sunlight would wish the resolution be passed.

As for the applicability of the Referenced Legal case, this is a matter for Attorneys.

SHOW UP ON FRIDAY JULY 11, 2008 AT THE DELEGATE ASSEMBLY AND SUPPORT DEMOCRACY AND OPEN GOVERNMENT IN CENTURY VILLAGE.

Dave Israel

Anonymous said...

Tomorrows vote may just be the FIRST skirmish in a long battle as someone for sure will test the results by some legal means as not the proper method no matter whether the vote is yes or no. Am I and most residents in favor of open meetings? Yes. Could there be a better method to resolve the situation? Possibly. Is this the right time when many of our delegates are not here? I just hope this is not the beginning of another protracted and expensive court matter, something that we do not need.

Anonymous said...

Are we not UCO...Uco carries out but we pay the bill...Don't you THINK we should have a right to meetings. Maybe those who don't think so...are afraid???

Anonymous said...

From the Desk of Phyllis Richland

You Are My Sunshine, My Only Sunshine

According to page 15 of the UCO Bylaws, paragraph H, the Sunshine Laws are used only as a guide for any and all meetings, with few exceptions: 1. meetings with attorneys, 2. Nominating and Ombudsman, 3. investigating prospective renters and or buyers and finally, issues relating to paid employees.

UCO must provide open records to its members, but open records is quite different than open meetings. Associations governed by F.S. 718 must provide both open records and open meetings. Chapter 617 which governs UCO does not mandate open meetings for committees. Our bylaws, that's UCO bylaws, say only the Delegate Assembly is an open meeting, which is our Board of Directors.

Any member of UCO, defined as a unit owner in good standing, can attend a committee meeting if invited by the chair or request to attend a specific meeting to discuss a subject related to that committee. After which the member is asked to leave so that the meeting may go on.

Policy of open meetings can be changed by the Executive Committee. Politics of a closed meeting could be a problem but there is no legal impediment.

UCO is not a Condo Association and is not subject to open meetings as per Chapter 718 F.S. Condominium Act, which governs Condo Associations.

UCO is not a governmental agency and therefore is not subject to the Sunshine Laws requiring open meetings.

UCO is a corporation not-for-profit subject to Chapter 617 F.S. That chapter has an open record provision, not an open meeting provision.

The rules governing the records inspection by members is very clearly spelled out in Chapter 617.1602 and 1603 F.S. This allows members to view the books and records of UCO with reasonable notice and proper purpose. See Millennium UCO Amendment Operating Agreement.

The rules governing the appointment of committees can be found in the UCO bylaws starting on page 6, article 8. Committees shall be selected and serve at the discretion of the President of UCO.

I have tried to explain as much as I could in simple language, so anyone seeking to attend a committee meeting can know what the guidelines are.

Anonymous said...

News Flash - This is one of the most open and democratic administrations that CV has had- NOT A CULT OF THE ELITE!! Once the Sunshine law issue is settled, one way or the other, lets get on with life, stop personal attacks and sarcastic comments and characterizations and work together in a more harmonious fashion.

elaineb said...

Anonymous 6:02
We get it, you can cut and paste but cannot add any of your own reasoning. So stop cluttering up the blog with seven repeats! If you were on Q&A you would be banned - ‘In order to avoid inundating the Forum with repetitious material..’ you get the idea.