Hi All,
In another Post on Insurance, A Nony Mouse (Nov 17, 2008 9:08:00 AM),
commented, in part, as follows:
"And you Dave, instead of giving a concise answer, you terrorize the people with reams of paper. How much is Levy paying you ??
"
In my 30+ years of Research, Collection and Analysis of Strategic and Tactical Intelligence, I have never heard anyone describe "Information" as "Terrorizing"
Not everything can be reduced to simplistic pap! For me to give a "Concise Answer" requires me to give my opinion on the meaning and interpretation of an ambiguously written set of Insurance Statutes.
As previously noted, I am NOT an Attorney and I do not intend to play at being one.
I did my best to research and present relevant Statute; it is for the reader to construe according to his/her wits the meaning and application of these Laws and Decisions.
As always, we are at liberty to consult an Attorney in the Field for a Competent Professional Legal Opinion, on the extant issues, perhaps the most prudent approach for UCO to pursue.
As always in these matters: Do not Shoot the Messenger"
Dave Israel
Information Terrorist!!!
PS:
As for the part about Mr. Levy paying me, that is an utterly absurd question, unworthy of response; but for the record, NO!!
Monday, November 17, 2008
GIVING A CONCISE ANSWER
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
Now the tone is being put to the test Dave tries to give the complete info on all matters! What I think in part what anoy. means is a synopsus of the problem? maybe
what he is trying to say after the entire writings of the problem to put to print ex. what it means in the translation in simplify terms
what we had, what we don't have now
law changed, or in the courts etc.
just facts, like the cable just facts and what procedures to try to resolved the problem. thank you in advance for all the info you give to this blog and also the others who work and or contibute.
My God Dave, I now believe you actually didn't know you were working for Levy. I'm sorry I called you a criminal. I just figured with your US Intelligence background, you would have got it a long time ago.
The end of the game is MONEY FOR LEVY. $260m plus $60m EXTRA !!
The start of the game was having stupid people who wanted power terroize their neighbors, ( with reams of paperwork and threats of lawyers and possible eviction (Levy owns the land under the condos, right )) and HEY, they were doing a good thing, RIGHT ?, Besides, Levy gave all this extra money to Israel, or at least the Kravitz center.
And once in a while you get a smart, persuasive body like Kurt Weiss and pull a coup de gra...having the unit owners pay to replace all your buildings, pools, roads, irrigation system..etc etc. Just call it maintenance. Yeah, they'd go for it. UCO SAYS !!! UCO SAYS !!!
But Levy made a little error. He let the idiots change their legal documents..voila !!...UCO is illegal and the Millenium Agreement is illegal and the Long Term Lease no longer applies.
So now that you know, Dave, you can petition the 15th District Court...the people that created UCO/Levy, to have a receiver and a small staff take over UCO.
Not only will we be legal, we will save approx. $550,000.
( and I bet they can get us a better Comcast deal )
And more !!
We can sell UCO's clubhouse and put the money into redoing the Haverhill Entrance ( it looks terrible). Then maybe, Century Village will not be at the bottom of every real estate list of the cheapest places to live in Palm Beach County ( cheaper than even mobile homes !! )
All I want is a legal Century Village which will then be a good looking Century Village ( what happened to the lady with all the flowers on your way to the Hastings Clubhouse, did she get UCO'd ) which will rise our property values up to where they should be ( double !! )
As yes, Mr. Levy, you will still get your $100 per month from ALL the unit owners forever and ever and ever. (But you'll have to pay yourself to replace the pools, awwwwww)
Mr. Levy does NOT own the land under the condo associations, only some of the common elements. This dumb rant by ccfj and other anons is getting tiresome.
To Anonymouse 4:07
Approx 2 years ago, I sat in the living room of ex-president of UCO Vivian Walsh. Also present was Irv Lazar, the "editor" of the UCO Reporter.The conversation got around to who owns the land under the Associations' condos. Both Mrs. Walsh and Mr. Lazar insisted that Levy owned the land under the buildings. I was amazed that these two people, having been in leadership positions,were so
un-informed ( or were they doing this on purpose) and were peddling this bull****, that UCO has been peddling for eons. So don't you think you should be tired of UCO and not ccfj ?
Hi All,
It is inconceivable to me that anyone owning a unit in CV could believe that Mr. Levy/WPRF owns the land under any Condominium Association Building in CV.
Every Unit Owner should have a set of Documents in their possession which include The Declaration of
Condominium, and the Bylaws; toward the end of your documents you will find a Survey showing the Condominium Association's property. It is your property, not WPRF's.
If you do not have these documents they are recoverable from the Clerk of Court Site, along with any Ammendments that your Association has filed with Clerk of Court
If you cannot find them there, or do not know how to look them up, Email me @ nsasigint@comcast.net, tell me the name of your Association and I will provide you with a Click by Click path to the "Book/Page" of your Association's survey; if there are a lot of Emails I will Post a BLOG on the process.
Dave Israel
IT
Dave:
What makes you think that these unit owners even bother to read their documents. ?
If they read the documents and comprehended the documents, there would be no need for UCO.
I have yet to figure out if it is lazy or stupid.
Thank you for all you are doing.
Post a Comment