Thursday, April 30, 2009

DON'T TUNE US OUT - YOUR CABLE COMMITTEE RESPONDS

Hi all,
The following has been submitted as a draft article to the UCO Reporter; it may or may not be published, depending on the decision of the Editorial Committee. In any case our BLOGGERS will get first chop:

Dave Israel
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DON’T TUNE US OUT – YOUR CABLE COMMITTEE RESPONDS
By Dave Israel
-
It is interesting to note that the signer of the “Mail Bag” letter, don’t tune us out, cannot be verified as a Unit Owner in Century Village and hence the article is Un-attributable. The letter shows misunderstanding of the process, but we have chosen to respond to it nonetheless, as an information vehicle for our Unit Owners. The responses will be intermixed with the original and my entries will be in a Bold blue type.

I went to the last Delegates Meeting and sat through a tremendous amount of discussion about the Cable Committee’s review and decision about the need to sign a new cable contract. I had attended previous meetings where there was discussion about why we needed a new contract — but for the life of me, I can’t remember why. Our current one doesn’t expire till 2011.
-
When the original cable contract was signed with Adelphia Cable in 2005 we had a channel lineup consisting of 74 channels, over recent years, arbitrary removal of channels by Comcast has reduced this to 67 and Comcast advised that this removal to the digital tier would continue. If we simply let the current contract play out, by 2011 we could be facing a channel lineup of 30 channels or less, with consecutive increases of 5% in January of 2010 and January 2011. When the contract expired, we would have no other competitor ready to pick up the service, as there would be no time for them to place their new infrastructure. We would have to simply rollover the Comcast contract with ever reducing service and there would have been no signing bonus.
-
I can understand us not liking Comcast removing stations at will — theirs, but if you read the disclaimer at the bottom of the sheet that was handed out at the meeting, nothing has changed in that regard; they can still remove stations at their own discretion.
-
Actually, we have had language inserted into the contract stating that Comcast may only remove channels from our lineup, if they remove the same channels from all customers in our Franchise area. This effectively precludes arbitrary redaction of content from Century Village product only.
-
Do we really think they’re going to add programming and not charge us?
-
Actually, if indeed they add programming, there will be no change in cost; the most probable course of events will be a swap of equivalent programming. This has already occurred; Comcast has taken away “Movieplex” and substituted “Lifetime Movie Network”. I would call that a reasonably equivalent swap.
-
What I think was that decisions were made at committee meetings that no one knew anything about. It seems to me that there was a royal stink a few months ago about transparency and openness. I’m a regular viewer of Channel 63 and always read the Reporter, but I saw no notification of Cable Committee meetings. I can go to Security, Maintenance, Transportation, Delegates, etc. meetings as a resident and time constraints considered, be heard or question any items discussed or commented on. Why no notification of the Cable Committee? We are talking about a new contract, worth a tremendous amount of money to Comcast and us and we were told take it or leave it, without as much as a clue of what was going on. I am not complaining about the new contract. How could I? I have no idea what the other companies were offering. But I was told that this was the best. What am I? Am I a child that won’t understand the big words?
-
Yes indeed there was a major brouhaha over “Open Meetings”, of which I was a major proponent. However, your Cable Committee was hearing from four major providers simultaneously, and none of them wanted the other to know what they were offering. This is very typical in contract negotiation, the offerings and proposals are all marked “Proprietary and Confidential”. The Cable Committee made every effort to release information in as timely a manner as possible. Every meeting that could be open was open, but some had to be limited to the principals involved. Some of our Unit Owners have come to the UCO Office to inquire about the other Companies and their proposals; and the Cable Committee has prepared a Decision Matrix chart showing the key components. This chart is available to any Unit Owner of Century Village, drop by the UCO Office and ask for Dave Israel; just do not blab it to Golden Lakes.
-
From what I can see, UCO will be getting a $2.3 million signing bonus, plus $27 thousand for the loss of the two remaining HBO channels — they already looted the third one.
-
Actually, the exact numbers are confidential and UCO has signed a Contract with a specific confidentiality clause. However any Unit Owner may have the numbers if they so desire; just come in to UCO and ask for Dave Israel. To correct one misconception, we were compensated for the loss of one HBO channel from the time it was pulled by Comcast in September 2008; it is virtually unheard of for Comcast to pay compensation for Channel realignments.
-
If you read the Treasurer’s report, you can see that the signing bonus is one year’s budgeted amount. So we get one year free basically. For the remainder of the time, we’ll pay an additional $4.12 per unit x 7,500+ units x 12 months x 5% annual increase. That’s a lot of money without residents’ input and hoping that Comcast will keep their word and not remove channels because they’ve got a newer and cheaper technology.
-
Actually there was extensive opportunity for Unit Owners to be heard at the Delegate Assembly; and many came forth and were heard. The issue of the cost is of course important; the initial cost of the new Bulk Cable Contract will be $22.95 per month plus Taxes and fees; this will be reduced by approximately $18.00 per month for the first year. The same product off campus at retail rates would cost $55.00 per month, and in some markets more. This is a bargain in any market. Our new lineup brings us back the missing channels, except for HBO, and adds some 18 additional channels. In particular, we will receive the Video on Demand channel which includes some 200 free movies, and other programming from HBO, Movieplex, Lifetime, Sundance and other major providers. In addition, our Bulk Channel Rate includes a Standard Set Top Box and two additional special Digital Converters. The concern over a new technology is a good one, common sense would suggest that if such new science or art were to emerge, that Comcast would deploy it at their discretion; there would be no impact on our cost during the contract period. It is the considered belief of the Committee that when our Unit Owners become familiar with the new channel lineup and with Video on Demand, they will be very pleased with the entertainment value available to them.

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

HOW WILL PEOPLE WHO NOW HAVE A $5-A-MONTH COMCAST BOX BE AFFECTED BY THE NEW CONTRACT?

UCO President said...

Hi A Nony Mouse
Apr 30, 2009 3:27:00 PM,

Any Unit Owner who now has a Comcast Cable Box, will receive an adjustment in cost for the difference in value of the box being distributed and the box you now have.

Dave Israel

Randall said...

David,
I support your judgment and actions regarding your contract negotiations and open meetings 100%and am quite grateful for your efforts as are many others.

I have drafted many amendments which will go through the proper channels, among which affects this very type of situation as follows:

H. The UCO Sunshine Amendment
Section 1: The Sunshine Laws as promulgated by the Federal and/or State authority shall be used as a guide for any and all meetings with the following exceptions:

1. dealings with UCO’s attorney and/or any other official entities or third parties which are privileged, confidential or otherwise may be considered sensitive in nature;

2. meetings of the Nominating Committee and the Ombudsman Committee;

3. meetings pertaining to between UCO Investigations of personnel and prospective new unit owners/occupants, Association board members, real estate agents, etc.;

4. issues pertaining to paid employees.

Thanks again for your continued efforts in your many endeavors.

Randall said...

Note correction:
The word 'of' in my post has been properly deleted in this correction.

3. meetings pertaining to between UCO Investigations personnel and prospective new unit owners/occupants, Association board members, real estate agents, etc.;

Anonymous said...

Just who, in the hell, gave You a permission to negotiate with some unknown company a contract so bad
for my own money?
I can get a better contract, for less time, by myself.
Who in te f444 hell cares for a 48
music channels? Have You heard about a wondefull invention called
a radio, that gets You a million channels for free?
You are, by some former admission a spook. Well, I am a P.I.G.

Ask , well, never mind.
It means I am not an enemy, just a person, who wholeheartedly disagrees with anything that smacks
of a socialist attidude of a c.v.
Let us do our own choices, we can do better on our own, obviously,
than You can.
Also, why are people who have a hearing problems, are on a "dole",
(i.e. collecting food stamps, are on a medicaid,etc.) advised they do NOT have to pay for a cable?
jb.

Randall said...

Anonymous 9:30
Decisions are made by the Board of Directors of Century Village... the largest Board of any U.S. corporation. David, acting as Cable Chair, personally expended enormous time and effort for the general benefit of his fellow residents. It is possible that someone of your temperment and attitude would be better suited in a more independent residential environment.

Regarding your question "Also, why are people who have a hearing problems, are on a "dole,
(i.e. collecting food stamps, are on a medicaid,etc.) advised they do NOT have to pay for a cable?" the following law may be instructive:

718.115.(1)(d) Florida Statutes

2. "Any such contract shall provide, and shall be deemed to provide if not expressly set forth, that any hearing-impaired or legally blind unit owner who does not occupy the unit with a non-hearing-impaired or sighted person, or any unit owner receiving supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act or food stamps as administered by the Department of Children and Family Services pursuant to s. 414.31, may discontinue the service without incurring disconnect fees, penalties, or subsequent service charges, and, as to such units, the owners shall not be required to pay any common expenses charge related to such service. If less than all members of an association share the expenses of cable television, the expense shall be shared equally by all participating unit owners. The association may use the provisions of s. 718.116 to enforce payment of the shares of such costs by the unit owners receiving cable television."

UCO President said...

Hi A Nony Mouse
Apr 30, 2009 9:30:00 PM,

I will attempt to answer your "Questions" point by point. below, in capital letters:

Just who, in the hell, gave You a permission to negotiate with some unknown company a contract so bad
for my own money?

THE BI-LATERAL AGREEMENT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZES UCO TO NEGOTIATE CONTRACTS IN CERTAIN CATEGORIES, OF WHICH CABLE TV IS BUT ONE.

FOLLOWING IS THE EXTRACTED SECTION OF THE AGREEMENT THAT APPLIES:

-----------------------
ARTICLE 2. Community Services

Community services, including security, transportation, road maintenance, cable television, perimeter lighting and road swale landscaping, have been declared common expenses under the Florida Condominium Act and/or agreed to in this document. These services will be provided by UCO on a Village wide basis. The Delegate Assembly will, from time to time, decide upon the amounts to be included in the ASSOCIATION'S budget. Said amounts to be paid by the ASSOCIATION to UCO on a quarterly basis or any other method decided upon by the Delegate Assembly.

------------------------

I can get a better contract, for less time, by myself.

I SINCERELY DOUBT YOU COULD OBTAIN A BETTER DEAL FOR THE VILLAGE. THE PACKAGE WE ARE RECEIVING RETAILS JUST OUTSIDE OUR GATES FOR $55.00.

Who in te f444 hell cares for a 48
music channels? Have You heard about a wondefull invention called
a radio, that gets You a million channels for free?

THE MUSIC CHANNELS ARE PART OF THE PACKAGE, WE SPECIFICALLY ASKED IF THERE WAS ANY COST SAVINGS TO BE REALISED BY REMOVING THEM. THE ANSWER IS THAT IT WOULD COST US TO HAVE THEM FILTERED OUT. BY THE WAY, SOME FOLKS LIKE THOSE CHANNELS.

You are, by some former admission a spook. Well, I am a P.I.G.

YES, I WAS A MEMBER OF THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY; WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH ANY OF THIS?

Ask , well, never mind.
It means I am not an enemy, just a person, who wholeheartedly disagrees with anything that smacks
of a socialist attidude of a c.v.
Let us do our own choices, we can do better on our own, obviously,
than You can.

THE EVIDENCE PLEASE?

Also, why are people who have a hearing problems, are on a "dole",
(i.e. collecting food stamps, are on a medicaid,etc.) advised they do NOT have to pay for a cable?
jb.

AS RANDALL POINTS OUT ABOVE, IT'S A MATTER OF LAW; SOMETHING A P.I.G. SHOULD RESPECT.

FINALLY, IF YOU THINK YOU CAN DO ANY OF THE THINGS NECESSARY TO RUN THE SMALL CITY KNOWN AS CENTURY VILLAGE, BETTER THAN IT IS BEING RUN; STEP UP AND VOLUNTEER!!!

Dave Israel

Grace said...

I really love the anonymous who from time to time crawl out from under their rock to beef away at anything and everything. This person has not bothered to attend the UCO monthly meetings open to all where it was voted that the cable committee could negotiate for us to the best of their ability to get a better deal on cable. I think they ought to be applauded for a very good deal. The delegates also voted to accept the Comcast proposal after much discussion. Where were you anonymous to busy or lazy to go to a meeting and ask questions and have your say????
Thanks Dave and committee for a good contract.

Anonymous said...

Dave...What happen to the consulting firm you hired to get us the best deal with a number of cable companies???? Is this the best deal that we can get from Comcast???? Why, Comcast with all the problems we have had with them in the last few years? When was it decided that we would go with Comcast and what are the benefits we would receive??? I am a snowbird and left the village on April 8th. Seems a lot has happen ...pertaining to cable since I left. What were the other deals from other companies?

UCO President said...

Hi A Nony Mouse
May 1, 2009 1:18:00 PM,

The consulting firm, CSI, did a very good job on our behalf, recommending 4 possible providers.

The Committee prepared a comparison matrix in spreadsheet format. If any unit owner would like a copy, please send me your name and Email address at:

nsasigint@comcast.net

Your name nor Email address will not be released to anyone.

Dave Israel

Anonymous said...

Anon 1:18 If you look thru several UCO Reporters you will find cable info. Especially pages 1-2 of the May issue on the candidates.